AgapeRevolution.com

Lack of Male Direction?

March 31, 2006 · Leave a Comment

The Washington Post has an article asking what is happening to the boys.

This phenomenon cuts across all demographics. You'll find it in families both rich and poor; black, white, Asian and Hispanic; urban, suburban and rural. According to the Census Bureau, fully one-third of young men ages 22 to 34 are still living at home with their parents — a roughly 100 percent increase in the past 20 years. No such change has occurred with regard to young women. Why?

My friend and colleague Judy Kleinfeld, a professor at the University of Alaska, has spent many years studying this growing phenomenon. She points out that many young women are living at home nowadays as well. But those young women usually have a definite plan. They're working toward a college degree, or they're saving money to open their own business. And when you come back three or four years later, you'll find that in most cases those young women have achieved their goal, or something like it. They've earned that degree. They've opened their business.

But not the boys. "The girls are driven; the boys have no direction," is the way Kleinfeld summarizes her findings. Kleinfeld is organizing a national Boys Project, with a board composed of leading researchers and writers such as Sandra Stotsky, Michael Thompson and Richard Whitmire, to figure out what's going wrong with boys. The project is only a few weeks old, it has called no news conferences and its Web site ( http://www.boysproject.net ) has just been launched.

I think that the problem can best be described as a lack of purpose, and I think that this lack of purpose is probably a result of the feminist movement. The feminist movement had some legitimate complaints about women being historically mistreated, but the solutions and rhetoric of the movement were too radical. (1) Women have taken on the traditional male role in society, and many do not need husbands for financial support at all. The traditional family structure offered a man the purpose of providing for and protecting his family. If women do not need provision or protection anymore, what is there left for males to do other than play video games? (2) The feminist movement launched an extremely hostile attack on men. The philosophical position of many feminists was very much like that of Marxists. Marxists argued that capitalism was the root cause of all of society's problems. Feminists argued that masculinity was the root cause of all of society's problems. After having launched a successful attack on masculinity, what we have now is the outgrowth of that, which is undriven males who just do not care about anything any more. (3) There could also be a rebellious element to this. Males may be tired of female empowerment, tired of being a social cancer, and tired of being put at a disadvantage in employment and college admissions. So the lack of motivation could be a conscious or unconscious expression of male frustration.

(Posted by Trask)

Categories: Culture

The Playboy Legacy

March 31, 2006 · Leave a Comment

The Wall Street Journal has an article today by Matthew Scully on the Playboy Legacy.

Hugh Hefner turns 80 next Sunday, and The Mansion is once again the place to be. "A major pajama party" is planned, as he told Maclean's, along with other observances equal to the dignity of the occasion. But this milestone also has "Hef" in a reflective mood, wondering how he will be remembered and trying to sum up "the major message in my life."
. . .
He is certainly right to believe that he has left his mark in the world. Richard Corliss in Time magazine is overstating it a bit when he writes that "porn doesn't affront contemporary community standards. It is a contemporary community standard." But he is close enough, and we have Hugh Marston Hefner, more than anyone else, to thank for the great plenitude of porn we take for granted today.

There was a dark and joyless time in America when one could actually go about daily life without ever encountering pornographic images. A child could grow up scarcely knowing that "adult entertainment" existed, much less acquainted with its many varieties. Hotel stays, in that prudish, stuffy era, had to be endured without pay-as-you-go porn, in-room and On Command. American males could not avail themselves of hundreds of millions of obscene films every year–as they do now, courtesy of even respectable corporations like Time Warner and Comcast–or take in the show at "gentlemen's clubs" when porn is not enough.

It was Mr. Hefner who put the real money in porn, a business hard to go poor in under any circumstances (except for the unfortunates given starring roles) and today a $57 billion-a-year global industry. He brought it into the central stream of culture, so that now even upscale bookstores stock Penthouse or similar offerings without a second thought. He gave porn that "classy" feel and its phony creed of "artistic" expression and protected "speech" by which far livelier fare than Playboy would soon ease into popular culture.

(Posted by Trask)

Categories: Culture

Onward Christian Soldiers

March 31, 2006 · 1 Comment

During the recent incident over Abdul Rahman, I read some responses of Christian leaders to the incident. I noticed a common theme among the Christian responses to the incident, which is that they were all state centered in their approach to the situation. When they saw the Rahman situation, there was only one issue that they thought was important, which was that Rahman was being oppressed by the Afghan government. I did not see a single Christian response to the event that praised Rahaman for the unbelievable sacrafice that he was making. I think that this highlights a problem within Christianity, which is that Christians excessively view the state as the solution to their problems instead of recognizing the transformational power of Christianity.

The prosecutor said that Rahman could avoid the death penalty if he renounced Christianity and converted back to Islam. Rahman rejected the offer. Rahman cared more about Jesus Christ than his own life. How many Christians in the religiously free west would turn down that offer if given the chance? The faith of Rahman was unbelievable, and the most that Christians could say in response to this event was that it was unfair. If Christians today lived at the time of Christ, how would they have responded to His trial and death? Would they have recognized the importance of the sacrifice that Jesus Christ was making or would they have been too busy writing about how the Jewish and Roman authorities were punishing Jesus unjustly? Jesus, obviously died an unjust death, but the injustice of the death of Jesus Christ on the cross is not what makes that event so important. It was the radical love of Jesus Christ and the redemptive nature of the sacrafice, which made it so incredible.

Christians have forgotten how Christianity became the world’s largest religion. It was through the suffering of early Christians who went and preached the gospel until they met their own unjust deaths. The willingness of early Christians to die for their faith had a powerful transformational effect. Agape love is far more powerful than any weapon. This is why Paul said, “‘If your enemy is hungry, feed him; if he is thirsty, give him something to drink. In doing this, you will heap burning coals on his head.’ Do not be overcome by evil, but overcome evil with good.” (Romans 12:17-21) Jesus told us that anything is possible with faith. “‘Truly I tell you, if you have faith as small as a mustard seed, you can say to this mountain, Move from here to there, and it will move. Nothing will be impossible for you.’” (Matthew 17:20) With nothing but faith and love, a small sect of Christian radicals conquered the Roman Empire without using a single weapon.

Christians in the West today have lost their faith. When they see problems in the world, the recourse to those problems is usually a legal recourse. The best example of this may be the problem of Islam. Islam is an evil religion that has perpetuated itself exclusively through coercion and the sword since its beginning. In Islamic nations today, there are endless confused Islamic radicals that are willing to launch endless suicide attacks on the U.S. The danger could become far more dangerous if the Islamic world obtains nuclear weapons. The problem with Islam is that it is almost impossible to defeat it militarily without using immoral means. The combination of guerilla warfare and suicide tactics make Islam extremely difficult to deal with.

The solution to this problem that most conservative Christians advocate is military action by the United States to combat the problem. Conservative Christians also tend to believe that spreading democracy will ultimately be the solution to the problems of the Muslim world. The flaw in this logic, as I have discussed before, is that democracy does not sanctify people or change their worldview. Therefore, setting up democracies in a part of the world with unvirtuous people will only produce unvirtuous democracies. I have also argued that from a strategic standpoint for the U.S., the best policy for the U.S. is to pull out of the region (after it completes any commitments that it has in Iraq) and allow Islam to destroy itself. The advantage of this solution is that while there will be bloodshed at least Islam will be suffering the consequences of its own intolerance instead of the U.S. However, this is an imperfect solution because no matter what the U.S. does many people are going to die. If the U.S. stays engaged in the region, it will only be able to deal with the security threats by using extreme and immoral tactics like torture and mass slaughter. If the U.S. disengages, there will be bloodshed from internal conflict in the Islamic world.

The only solution to the problem of Islam is an option that unlike democracy actually can sanctify people and change their worldview, which is Jesus Christ. The Christian Church needs to send an army of Christian soldiers into the Islamic world who will bring nothing with them but faith, love, and the gospel. These Christian soldiers would conquer the Islamic world with love. There would be some bloodshed, but not close to as much bloodshed as would occur through the state based solutions, and unlike the state based solutions, Christian soldiers can offer eternal salvation instead of just physical salvation. These missionaries should not come from the West. The Islamic world has so much animosity toward the West that Western missionaries would probably be an ineffective army. This army would have to come from the rapidly growing church in Africa and East Asia. Western Christians would have to sacrifice by providing massive amounts of financial resources to fund this Christian army to the Islamic world.

I am not arguing that state based solutions are never appropriate. When the lives of Christians are at risk, Christians should use all means available to come to the aid of those Christians. After all, the Apostle Paul made use of his legal options when he appealed to Caesar while he was on trial for unjust reasons. However, Christians need to move beyond their state centered approach to problems. When Christians like Abdul Rahman risk death by taking a stance for the faith, Christians need to recognize the greatness of the stance and not just the unfairness of the situation. Christianity conquered the Roman Empire with nothing more than faith, love, and the gospel. Now the Church needs to conquer the Muslim world with an army of Christians who use the same tactics.

Onward, Christian Soldiers

Onward, Christian soldiers, marching as to war,

With the cross of Jesus going on before.

Christ, the royal Master, leads against the foe;

Forward into battle see His banners go!

Refrain

Onward, Christian soldiers, marching as to war,

With the cross of Jesus going on before.

At the sign of triumph Satan’s host doth flee;

On then, Christian soldiers, on to victory!

Hell’s foundations quiver at the shout of praise;

Brothers lift your voices, loud your anthems raise.

Refrain

Like a mighty army moves the church of God;

Brothers, we are treading where the saints have trod.

We are not divided, all one body we,

One in hope and doctrine, one in charity.

Refrain

What the saints established that I hold for true.

What the saints believed, that I believe too.

Long as earth endureth, men the faith will hold,

Kingdoms, nations, empires, in destruction rolled.

Refrain

Crowns and thrones may perish, kingdoms rise and wane,

But the church of Jesus constant will remain.

Gates of hell can never gainst that church prevail;

We have Christ’s own promise, and that cannot fail.

Refrain

Onward then, ye people, join our happy throng,

Blend with ours your voices in the triumph song.

Glory, laud and honor unto Christ the King,

This through countless ages men and angels sing.

Refrain

(Posted by Trask)

Categories: Agape Revolution · Politics · Theology

Highest Court of Massachusetts Upholds Restrictions on Marriage Licenses

March 31, 2006 · Leave a Comment

The New York Times is reporting that the highest court of Massachusetts has just held that it is constitutional for the state to prohibit a resident from another state from getting a marriage license in Massachusetts if the marriage license would be void in the applicant's home state.

Massachusetts's highest court ruled today that same-sex couples who live in other states cannot get married in Massachusetts unless gay marriage is legal in their home states.

In an opinion written by Justice Francis X. Spina, the court upheld a 1913 statute that says that no out-of-state resident can get married in Massachusetts if the marriage would be void in the person's home state, unless the person intends to live in Massachusetts. Five justices concurred, at least in part, with Justice Spina's opinion; one justice dissented.

"The laws of this commonwealth have not endowed nonresidents with an unfettered right to marry," Justice Spina wrote for the majority. "To the contrary, the rights of nonresidents to marry in Massachusetts have been specifically restricted."

He added, "I recognize that the brunt" of the law's impact "has inevitably fallen disproportionately on nonresident same-sex couples rather than on nonresident opposite-sex couples" because no other state currently allows gay marriage.

However, he said, the fact that the court had ruled in November 2003 that Massachusetts same-sex couples should be allowed to marry "does not now compel a conclusion that nonresident same-sex couples, who have no intention of living in Massachusetts, have an identical right to secure a marriage license that they could not otherwise obtain in their home states."

(Posted by Trask)

Categories: Current Events · Law

Agape Love in Second Chronicles and Luke

March 31, 2006 · Leave a Comment

Second Chronicles Chapter Thirty

Hezekiah sent word to all Israel and Judah and also wrote letters to Ephraim and Manasseh, inviting them to come to the temple of the LORD in Jerusalem and celebrate the Passover to the LORD, the God of Israel. The king and his officials and the whole assembly in Jerusalem decided to celebrate the Passover in the second month. They had not been able to celebrate it at the regular time because not enough priests had consecrated themselves and the people had not assembled in Jerusalem. The plan seemed right both to the king and to the whole assembly. They decided to send a proclamation throughout Israel, from Beersheba to Dan, calling the people to come to Jerusalem and celebrate the Passover to the LORD, the God of Israel. It had not been celebrated in large numbers according to what was written.

At the king's command, couriers went throughout Israel and Judah with letters from the king and from his officials, which read: "People of Israel, return to the LORD, the God of Abraham, Isaac and Israel, that he may return to you who are left, who have escaped from the hand of the kings of Assyria. Do not be like your parents and your fellow Israelites, who were unfaithful to the LORD, the God of their ancestors, so that he made them an object of horror, as you see. Do not be stiff-necked, as your parents were; submit to the LORD. Come to his sanctuary, which he has consecrated forever. Serve the LORD your God, so that his fierce anger will turn away from you. If you return to the LORD, then your fellow Israelites and your children will be shown compassion by their captors and will return to this land, for the LORD your God is gracious and compassionate. He will not turn his face from you if you return to him."

The couriers went from town to town in Ephraim and Manasseh, as far as Zebulun, but people scorned and ridiculed them. Nevertheless, some from Asher, Manasseh and Zebulun humbled themselves and went to Jerusalem. Also in Judah the hand of God was on the people to give them unity of mind to carry out what the king and his officials had ordered, following the word of the LORD.

A very large crowd of people assembled in Jerusalem to celebrate the Festival of Unleavened Bread in the second month. They removed the altars in Jerusalem and cleared away the incense altars and threw them into the Kidron Valley.

They slaughtered the Passover lamb on the fourteenth day of the second month. The priests and the Levites were ashamed and consecrated themselves and brought burnt offerings to the temple of the LORD. Then they took up their regular positions as prescribed in the Law of Moses the man of God. The priests splashed against the altar the blood handed to them by the Levites. Since many in the crowd had not consecrated themselves, the Levites had to kill the Passover lambs for all those who were not ceremonially clean and could not consecrate [their lambs] to the LORD. Although most of the many people who came from Ephraim, Manasseh, Issachar and Zebulun had not purified themselves, yet they ate the Passover, contrary to what was written. But Hezekiah prayed for them, saying, "May the LORD, who is good, pardon everyone  who sets their heart on seeking God—the LORD, the God of their ancestors—even if they are not clean according to the rules of the sanctuary." And the LORD heard Hezekiah and healed the people.

The Israelites who were present in Jerusalem celebrated the Festival of Unleavened Bread for seven days with great rejoicing, while the Levites and priests praised the LORD every day with resounding instruments dedicated to the LORD.

Hezekiah spoke encouragingly to all the Levites, who showed good understanding of the service of the LORD. For the seven days they ate their assigned portion and offered fellowship offerings and praised the LORD, the God of their ancestors.

The whole assembly then agreed to celebrate the festival seven more days; so for another seven days they celebrated joyfully. Hezekiah king of Judah provided a thousand bulls and seven thousand sheep and goats for the assembly, and the officials provided them with a thousand bulls and ten thousand sheep and goats. A great number of priests consecrated themselves. The entire assembly of Judah rejoiced, along with the priests and Levites and all who had assembled from Israel, including the foreigners who had come from Israel and also those who resided in Judah. There was great joy in Jerusalem, for since the days of Solomon son of David king of Israel there had been nothing like this in Jerusalem. The priests and the Levites stood to bless the people, and God heard them, for their prayer reached heaven, his holy dwelling place.

Luke Chapter Fourteen

When one of those at the table with him heard this, he said to Jesus, "Blessed are those who will eat at the feast in the kingdom of God."

Jesus replied: "A certain man was preparing a great banquet and invited many guests. At the time of the banquet he sent his servant to tell those who had been invited, 'Come, for everything is now ready.'

But they all alike began to make excuses. The first said, 'I have just bought a field, and I must go and see it. Please excuse me.'

"Another said, 'I have just bought five yoke of oxen, and I'm on my way to try them out. Please excuse me.'

"Still another said, 'I just got married, so I can't come.'

"The servant came back and reported this to his master. Then the owner of the house became angry and ordered his servant, 'Go out quickly into the streets and alleys of the town and bring in the poor, the crippled, the blind and the lame.'

"'Sir,' the servant said, 'what you ordered has been done, but there is still room.'

"Then the master told his servant, 'Go out to the roads and country lanes and compel them to come in, so that my house will be full. I tell you, not one of those who were invited will get a taste of my banquet.'"

(Posted by Trask)

Categories: Agape Revolution · Theology